Table A.2
Comparison matrix between CMAs1 showing percentage point difference between individual CMAs, Social Incivility

Warning View the most recent version.

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

  Halifax Québec City Montréal Ottawa/Gatineau Toronto Hamilton Winnipeg Regina Saskatoon Calgary Edmonton Vancouver
percentage point difference
Halifax
...
9*
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
9*
ns
ns
Québec City
9*
...
8*
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
10*
Montréal
ns
8*
...
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
8*
ns
ns
Ottawa/Gatineau
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
Toronto
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
6*
Hamilton
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
8*
Winnipeg
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
ns
ns
ns
7*
Regina
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
ns
ns
9*
Saskatoon
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
ns
ns
Calgary
9*
ns
8*
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
10*
Edmonton
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
...
ns
Vancouver
ns
10*
ns
ns
6*
8*
7*
9*
ns
10*
ns
...
* Difference between CMAs is statistically significant at p<0.01
ns No statistically significant difference
1. Census Metropolitan Area
Note on interpreting this matrix table: Choose the row containing one of the CMAs you wish to compare, and follow it until you reach the column for the other CMA.
The cell shows the percentage point difference between rates of social incivility in the two CMAs. If the difference is not statistically significant, the cell shows "ns (blank).
For example, there is an 8 percentage point difference between Montréal and Québec City (24% and 16%, as shown in Table 2) and an 8 percentage point difference between Montreal and Calgary (24% and 16%). However, the difference between Montréal and any other CMAs in the study is not statistically significant.
Source: Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2004