Filter results by

Search Help
Currently selected filters that can be removed

Keyword(s)

Year of publication

1 facets displayed. 1 facets selected.

Survey or statistical program

1 facets displayed. 0 facets selected.
Sort Help
entries

Results

All (3)

All (3) ((3 results))

  • Articles and reports: 11-522-X201300014286
    Description:

    The Étude Longitudinale Française depuis l’Enfance (ELFE) [French longitudinal study from childhood on], which began in 2011, involves over 18,300 infants whose parents agreed to participate when they were in the maternity hospital. This cohort survey, which will track the children from birth to adulthood, covers the many aspects of their lives from the perspective of social science, health and environmental health. In randomly selected maternity hospitals, all infants in the target population, who were born on one of 25 days distributed across the four seasons, were chosen. This sample is the outcome of a non-standard sampling scheme that we call product sampling. In this survey, it takes the form of the cross-tabulation between two independent samples: a sampling of maternity hospitals and a sampling of days. While it is easy to imagine a cluster effect due to the sampling of maternity hospitals, one can also imagine a cluster effect due to the sampling of days. The scheme’s time dimension therefore cannot be ignored if the desired estimates are subject to daily or seasonal variation. While this non-standard scheme can be viewed as a particular kind of two-phase design, it needs to be defined within a more specific framework. Following a comparison of the product scheme with a conventional two-stage design, we propose variance estimators specially formulated for this sampling scheme. Our ideas are illustrated with a simulation study.

    Release date: 2014-10-31

  • Articles and reports: 12-002-X201400111901
    Description:

    This document is for analysts/researchers who are considering doing research with data from a survey where both survey weights and bootstrap weights are provided in the data files. This document gives directions, for some selected software packages, about how to get started in using survey weights and bootstrap weights for an analysis of survey data. We give brief directions for obtaining survey-weighted estimates, bootstrap variance estimates (and other desired error quantities) and some typical test statistics for each software package in turn. While these directions are provided just for the chosen examples, there will be information about the range of weighted and bootstrapped analyses that can be carried out by each software package.

    Release date: 2014-08-07

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400114003
    Description:

    Outside of the survey sampling literature, samples are often assumed to be generated by simple random sampling process that produces independent and identically distributed (IID) samples. Many statistical methods are developed largely in this IID world. Application of these methods to data from complex sample surveys without making allowance for the survey design features can lead to erroneous inferences. Hence, much time and effort have been devoted to develop the statistical methods to analyze complex survey data and account for the sample design. This issue is particularly important when generating synthetic populations using finite population Bayesian inference, as is often done in missing data or disclosure risk settings, or when combining data from multiple surveys. By extending previous work in finite population Bayesian bootstrap literature, we propose a method to generate synthetic populations from a posterior predictive distribution in a fashion inverts the complex sampling design features and generates simple random samples from a superpopulation point of view, making adjustment on the complex data so that they can be analyzed as simple random samples. We consider a simulation study with a stratified, clustered unequal-probability of selection sample design, and use the proposed nonparametric method to generate synthetic populations for the 2006 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which are stratified, clustered unequal-probability of selection sample designs.

    Release date: 2014-06-27
Stats in brief (0)

Stats in brief (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Articles and reports (3)

Articles and reports (3) ((3 results))

  • Articles and reports: 11-522-X201300014286
    Description:

    The Étude Longitudinale Française depuis l’Enfance (ELFE) [French longitudinal study from childhood on], which began in 2011, involves over 18,300 infants whose parents agreed to participate when they were in the maternity hospital. This cohort survey, which will track the children from birth to adulthood, covers the many aspects of their lives from the perspective of social science, health and environmental health. In randomly selected maternity hospitals, all infants in the target population, who were born on one of 25 days distributed across the four seasons, were chosen. This sample is the outcome of a non-standard sampling scheme that we call product sampling. In this survey, it takes the form of the cross-tabulation between two independent samples: a sampling of maternity hospitals and a sampling of days. While it is easy to imagine a cluster effect due to the sampling of maternity hospitals, one can also imagine a cluster effect due to the sampling of days. The scheme’s time dimension therefore cannot be ignored if the desired estimates are subject to daily or seasonal variation. While this non-standard scheme can be viewed as a particular kind of two-phase design, it needs to be defined within a more specific framework. Following a comparison of the product scheme with a conventional two-stage design, we propose variance estimators specially formulated for this sampling scheme. Our ideas are illustrated with a simulation study.

    Release date: 2014-10-31

  • Articles and reports: 12-002-X201400111901
    Description:

    This document is for analysts/researchers who are considering doing research with data from a survey where both survey weights and bootstrap weights are provided in the data files. This document gives directions, for some selected software packages, about how to get started in using survey weights and bootstrap weights for an analysis of survey data. We give brief directions for obtaining survey-weighted estimates, bootstrap variance estimates (and other desired error quantities) and some typical test statistics for each software package in turn. While these directions are provided just for the chosen examples, there will be information about the range of weighted and bootstrapped analyses that can be carried out by each software package.

    Release date: 2014-08-07

  • Articles and reports: 12-001-X201400114003
    Description:

    Outside of the survey sampling literature, samples are often assumed to be generated by simple random sampling process that produces independent and identically distributed (IID) samples. Many statistical methods are developed largely in this IID world. Application of these methods to data from complex sample surveys without making allowance for the survey design features can lead to erroneous inferences. Hence, much time and effort have been devoted to develop the statistical methods to analyze complex survey data and account for the sample design. This issue is particularly important when generating synthetic populations using finite population Bayesian inference, as is often done in missing data or disclosure risk settings, or when combining data from multiple surveys. By extending previous work in finite population Bayesian bootstrap literature, we propose a method to generate synthetic populations from a posterior predictive distribution in a fashion inverts the complex sampling design features and generates simple random samples from a superpopulation point of view, making adjustment on the complex data so that they can be analyzed as simple random samples. We consider a simulation study with a stratified, clustered unequal-probability of selection sample design, and use the proposed nonparametric method to generate synthetic populations for the 2006 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which are stratified, clustered unequal-probability of selection sample designs.

    Release date: 2014-06-27
Journals and periodicals (0)

Journals and periodicals (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Date modified: