Employment and unemployment

Key indicators

Changing any selection will automatically update the page content.

Selected geographical area: Canada

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Canada

Selected geographical area: Newfoundland and Labrador

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Newfoundland and Labrador

Selected geographical area: Prince Edward Island

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Prince Edward Island

Selected geographical area: Nova Scotia

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Nova Scotia

Selected geographical area: New Brunswick

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: New Brunswick

Selected geographical area: Quebec

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Quebec

Selected geographical area: Ontario

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Ontario

Selected geographical area: Manitoba

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Manitoba

Selected geographical area: Saskatchewan

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Saskatchewan

Selected geographical area: Alberta

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Alberta

Selected geographical area: British Columbia

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: British Columbia

Selected geographical area: Yukon

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Yukon

Selected geographical area: Northwest Territories

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Northwest Territories

Selected geographical area: Nunavut

More employment and unemployment indicators

Selected geographical area: Nunavut

Filter results by

Search Help
Currently selected filters that can be removed

Keyword(s)

Sort Help
entries

Results

All (1)

All (1) ((1 result))

  • Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 12-001-X19980024349
    Description:

    Measurement of gross flows in labour force status is an important objective of the continuing labour force surveys carried out by many national statistics agencies. However, it is well known that estimation of these flows can be complicated by nonresponse, measurement errors, sample rotation and complex design effects. Motivated by nonresponse patterns in household-based surveys, this paper focuses on estimation of labour force gross flows, while simultaneously adjusting for nonignorable nonresponse. Previous model-based approaches to gross flows estimation have assumed nonresponse to be an individual-level process. We propose a class of models that allow for nonignorable household-level nonresponse. A simulation study is used to show, that individual-level labour force gross flows estimates from household-based survey data, may be biased and that estimates using household-level models can offer a reduction in this bias.

    Release date: 1999-01-14
Data (0)

Data (0) (0 results)

No content available at this time.

Analysis (1)

Analysis (1) ((1 result))

  • Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 12-001-X19980024349
    Description:

    Measurement of gross flows in labour force status is an important objective of the continuing labour force surveys carried out by many national statistics agencies. However, it is well known that estimation of these flows can be complicated by nonresponse, measurement errors, sample rotation and complex design effects. Motivated by nonresponse patterns in household-based surveys, this paper focuses on estimation of labour force gross flows, while simultaneously adjusting for nonignorable nonresponse. Previous model-based approaches to gross flows estimation have assumed nonresponse to be an individual-level process. We propose a class of models that allow for nonignorable household-level nonresponse. A simulation study is used to show, that individual-level labour force gross flows estimates from household-based survey data, may be biased and that estimates using household-level models can offer a reduction in this bias.

    Release date: 1999-01-14
Reference (1)

Reference (1) ((1 result))

  • Surveys and statistical programs – Documentation: 12-001-X19980024349
    Description:

    Measurement of gross flows in labour force status is an important objective of the continuing labour force surveys carried out by many national statistics agencies. However, it is well known that estimation of these flows can be complicated by nonresponse, measurement errors, sample rotation and complex design effects. Motivated by nonresponse patterns in household-based surveys, this paper focuses on estimation of labour force gross flows, while simultaneously adjusting for nonignorable nonresponse. Previous model-based approaches to gross flows estimation have assumed nonresponse to be an individual-level process. We propose a class of models that allow for nonignorable household-level nonresponse. A simulation study is used to show, that individual-level labour force gross flows estimates from household-based survey data, may be biased and that estimates using household-level models can offer a reduction in this bias.

    Release date: 1999-01-14
Date modified: