Keyword search
Filter results by
Search HelpKeyword(s)
Subject
Survey or statistical program
Results
All (4)
All (4) ((4 results))
- Articles and reports: 88F0006X2007007Description:
Results from the Survey of Innovation 2003 raised some interesting questions. First, an unexpected one-third of establishments in R&D services were not innovative. According to the guidelines of the Oslo Manual, innovative establishments are those that introduced a new or significantly improved product or process on to the market or into production, within a specified interval. Second, many of these non-innovative establishments indicated that satisfying existing customers was irrelevant to their firms success. This was very different response from all other types of firms.
This working paper provides a potential explanation of these unexpected results, as well as an overview of available information on establishments in R&D services (NAICS 5417) in the context of professional services generally. The paper assembles descriptive data to show that non-innovative establishments in R&D services differ significantly from other non-innovative establishments and, while not innovative, they are nevertheless highly inventive. It presents some evidence to suggest that they are venture firms (firms relying on infusions of investment capital rather than revenues from sales to sustain their operations) and proposes a specific set of indicators that would facilitate resolution of the nature of firms in this industry group.
Release date: 2007-12-20 - Articles and reports: 88F0006X2007006Description:
This descriptive working paper provides highlights from the Biotechnology Use and Development Survey 2005. Data on innovative biotechnology firms are presented by region, sectors and firm size. The data include firm revenues, R&D activities, human resources, firm financing, age of firms, country of control and the proportion of publicly traded firms.
Release date: 2007-12-05 - 3. Coming of age - biotech revenues are on the rise ArchivedArticles and reports: 88-003-X20030016476Geography: CanadaDescription:
Canadian biotechnology is gaining momentum. More firms are getting their products onto the markets and increasing revenues. With the human health sector leading the way, biotechnology revenues rose by a massive 343% for the 1997 to 2001 period, reaching $3.5 billion in 2001. During this same period, the number of firms increased by 33%.
Release date: 2003-02-18 - Articles and reports: 88-003-X20010035972Geography: CanadaDescription:
Based on information from the 1997 Biotechnology Firm Survey, we know biotechnology firms generated $813 million in biotech revenues; employed 9,000 people in biotech-related activities and had almost 9,000 products across all stages of development. Explore issues such as - What are the main features of this sector? What is the extent of networking activities by the firms? And what kinds of problems are they facing when selling their products?
Release date: 2001-10-31
Data (0)
Data (0) (0 results)
No content available at this time.
Analysis (4)
Analysis (4) ((4 results))
- Articles and reports: 88F0006X2007007Description:
Results from the Survey of Innovation 2003 raised some interesting questions. First, an unexpected one-third of establishments in R&D services were not innovative. According to the guidelines of the Oslo Manual, innovative establishments are those that introduced a new or significantly improved product or process on to the market or into production, within a specified interval. Second, many of these non-innovative establishments indicated that satisfying existing customers was irrelevant to their firms success. This was very different response from all other types of firms.
This working paper provides a potential explanation of these unexpected results, as well as an overview of available information on establishments in R&D services (NAICS 5417) in the context of professional services generally. The paper assembles descriptive data to show that non-innovative establishments in R&D services differ significantly from other non-innovative establishments and, while not innovative, they are nevertheless highly inventive. It presents some evidence to suggest that they are venture firms (firms relying on infusions of investment capital rather than revenues from sales to sustain their operations) and proposes a specific set of indicators that would facilitate resolution of the nature of firms in this industry group.
Release date: 2007-12-20 - Articles and reports: 88F0006X2007006Description:
This descriptive working paper provides highlights from the Biotechnology Use and Development Survey 2005. Data on innovative biotechnology firms are presented by region, sectors and firm size. The data include firm revenues, R&D activities, human resources, firm financing, age of firms, country of control and the proportion of publicly traded firms.
Release date: 2007-12-05 - 3. Coming of age - biotech revenues are on the rise ArchivedArticles and reports: 88-003-X20030016476Geography: CanadaDescription:
Canadian biotechnology is gaining momentum. More firms are getting their products onto the markets and increasing revenues. With the human health sector leading the way, biotechnology revenues rose by a massive 343% for the 1997 to 2001 period, reaching $3.5 billion in 2001. During this same period, the number of firms increased by 33%.
Release date: 2003-02-18 - Articles and reports: 88-003-X20010035972Geography: CanadaDescription:
Based on information from the 1997 Biotechnology Firm Survey, we know biotechnology firms generated $813 million in biotech revenues; employed 9,000 people in biotech-related activities and had almost 9,000 products across all stages of development. Explore issues such as - What are the main features of this sector? What is the extent of networking activities by the firms? And what kinds of problems are they facing when selling their products?
Release date: 2001-10-31
Reference (0)
Reference (0) (0 results)
No content available at this time.
- Date modified: