Labour Force Survey, June 2022
Employment fell by 43,000 (-0.2%) in June. The unemployment rate fell 0.2 percentage points to a new record low of 4.9%, as fewer people searched for work.
The employment loss was almost entirely due to a decrease among workers aged 55 and older. Across industries, a decline in the services-producing sector, particularly in retail trade, was moderated by gains in the goods-producing sector. At the provincial level, employment decreased in Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec, while there were gains in Prince Edward Island and Manitoba.
Self-employment declined, while the number of employees in both the public and the private sectors held steady.
Total hours worked rose 1.3% in June, the first increase since March 2022.
Average hourly wages rose 5.2% (+$1.54 to $31.24) on a year-over-year basis in June, up from 3.9% in May and 3.3% in April (not seasonally adjusted).
Employment falls in June
Employment fell by 43,000 (-0.2%) in June, fully offsetting the increase of 40,000 recorded in May.
The number of self-employed workers fell by 59,000 (-2.2%), while the number of employees held steady in both the public and the private sectors.
Employment was down among workers aged 55 and over (-51,000; -1.2%). It was little changed among youth aged 15 to 24 and the core-age population aged 25 to 54.
Employment decreased in Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec, while there were gains in Prince Edward Island and Manitoba.
Employment in the services-producing sector declined by 76,000 (-0.5%) in June, with losses spread across several industries, including retail trade.
In the goods-producing sector, employment rose by 33,000 (+0.8%) in June, with gains in construction and manufacturing.
Total hours worked increased 1.3% in June.
Average hourly wages rose 5.2% (+$1.54 to $31.24) on a year-over-year basis in June, up from 3.9% in May.
Unemployment rate reaches fourth consecutive record low
The unemployment rate reached a new low of 4.9% in June, and the participation rate fell 0.4 percentage points to 64.9%.
The adjusted unemployment rate—which includes people who were not in the labour force but wanted to work—decreased 0.2 percentage points to 6.8% in June, the second consecutive record low.
Long-term unemployment stood at 185,000 in June.
Employment declines for the first time since January 2022
Employment fell by 43,000 (-0.2%) in June, offsetting the increase of 40,000 recorded in May. This marks the first employment decline not associated with a tightening of public health restrictions since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Self-employment falls in June
The number of self-employed workers fell by 59,000 (-2.2%) in June, while the number of employees in both the public and the private sectors held steady. The June decrease erased most of the growth in self-employment recorded since October 2021 and pushed down the number of self-employed workers to 249,000 (-8.6%) below February 2020 pre-COVID-19 levels.
In the same way that employees may leave their job to start a business, every month some self-employed workers find work as employees. In the context of high job vacancies and accelerating wage growth, 5.0% of people who were self-employed in May became employees in June. This rate was similar to the transition rate in June 2021 (5.0%) and remained more than twice as high as the average rate recorded from 2016 to 2019 (2.4%) (not seasonally adjusted).
Involuntary part-time work continues to fall
While both full-time and part-time employment were little changed in June, full-time work has increased on a cumulative basis over the last two months. Compared with April, full-time employment was up by 131,000 (+0.8%) in June, while part-time work was down by 135,000 (-3.6%). The involuntary part-time rate—the proportion of part-time workers who cannot find a full-time job—has continued to fall in recent months and reached a new record low of 14.0% in June, down from 19.4% in February 2020, before the pandemic.
In June, the proportion of part-time workers who could not find full-time work was above average among Latin American (25.7%), Chinese (21.7%) and Black Canadians (21.2%) (three-month moving averages, not seasonally adjusted).
Employment decreases among workers aged 55 and older
Employment among people aged 55 and older fell by 51,000 (-1.2%) in June. This was the first decline among older workers since April 2021 and was driven by a decrease among men aged 55 to 64 (-32,000; -1.8%).
In June, the employment rate—the proportion of the population that is employed—fell 0.7 percentage points to 62.5% among people aged 55 to 64. This decrease eliminated increases seen earlier in 2022 and returned the employment rate to a level on par with that observed through the second half of 2021. The employment rate among people aged 55 to 64 ranged from 50.7% among First Nations people living off-reserve and 52.1% among Southeast Asian Canadians, to 74.9% among Arab Canadians and 80.7% among Filipino Canadians (three-month moving averages, not seasonally adjusted).
In the core-working ages of 25 to 54, employment was little changed for both men and women in June, and the employment rate of both core-aged men (88.0%) and core-aged women (81.3%) remained at or just below the record highs reached during the spring.
Employment also held steady for male and female youth aged 15 to 24 in June, and the employment rate in this age group (58.5%) stayed close to the pre-pandemic high recorded in April 2019 (58.7%).
Student employment continues to be above pre-pandemic levels in June
Alongside the elevated employment rate for youth, conditions continued to be favourable for students in the summer job market.
From May to August, the Labour Force Survey (LFS) collects labour market data on youth aged 15 to 24 who were full-time students in March and who intend to return to school full time in September. The May and June survey results provide the first indicators of the summer job market, especially for those aged 20 to 24, as many younger students aged 15 to 19 are still in school.
The employment rate among returning students aged 15 to 24 was higher in June (53.2%) than before the pandemic in June 2019 (51.2%), mirroring the situation observed in May 2022. A notable part of this increase is attributable to female students aged 20 to 24, more than three-quarters (76.0%) of whom were employed in June. This was the highest June employment rate on record for this group since comparable data first became available in 1977. The employment rate of male students aged 20 to 24 was 68.8% in June 2022, unchanged compared with June 2019 (not seasonally adjusted).
From June 2019 to June 2022, employment among female students aged 20 to 24 increased notably in educational services (+14,000; +70.9%) and health care and social assistance (+14,000; +32.9%) (not seasonally adjusted).
Unemployment rate hits record low for fourth consecutive month
The unemployment rate reached a new historic low of 4.9% in June, down 0.2 percentage points from the previous record in May. The total number of unemployed workers fell by 54,000 (-5.1%) to 1.0 million.
With both employment and unemployment falling in June, the labour force participation rate—the proportion of the working age population who were either employed or unemployed—fell 0.4 percentage points from May to 64.9%.
The drop in labour force participation in June was not associated with an elevated number of discouraged searchers. There were 421,000 people who wanted a job but did not look for one, little changed from May. The adjusted unemployment rate—which accounts for this source of potential labour supply—decreased 0.2 percentage points to 6.8% in June, marking the second consecutive record low.
Decline in unemployment rate and participation rate widespread across demographic groups
The unemployment rate among people aged 25 to 54 declined 0.2 percentage points to 4.1% in June, reaching a new record low. Among core-aged men, the unemployment rate dropped 0.3 percentage points to 4.0% in June, accompanied by a drop in the labour force participation rate (-0.2 percentage points to 91.7%). Among core-aged women, both the unemployment rate (4.2%) and the participation rate (84.8%) were little changed in June.
The unemployment rate for youth aged 15 to 24 fell 0.6 percentage points to 9.2%. The rate dropped a full percentage point to 7.1% for female youth, while it was little changed for their male counterparts (11.1%). The labour force participation rate dropped 0.7 percentage points for both male (63.7%) and female (65.3%) youth.
Among women aged 55 and older, the unemployment rate fell 0.5 percentage points to 3.6% in June, trending downward for the eighth consecutive month, while their participation rate fell 0.5 percentage points to 31.2%. Among men aged 55 and older, the unemployment rate (5.2%) was little changed in June, while the participation rate (41.4%) was 0.5 percentage points lower than in May.
Long-term unemployment returns to pre-pandemic levels for the first time
The number of people who had been continuously unemployed for 27 weeks or more stood at 185,000 in June, a drop of 24,000 (-11.3%) compared with May. The decline was driven entirely by a decrease in the number of people who had been continuously unemployed for one year or longer (-22,000; -17.5%). Typically, people who are unemployed for one year or longer are more likely than those who are unemployed for shorter periods of time to drop out of unemployment because they stop looking for work. Among people who were in this group in May, 21.3% stopped looking for work in June, while 9.4% became employed. The remaining 69.3% remained unemployed (three-month moving averages, not seasonally adjusted).
As of June, the number of long-term unemployed, calculated as a proportion of the total labour force, had returned to the level (0.9%) recorded in February 2020. This represents a faster drop in long-term unemployment than following previous labour market disruptions. After the 2008/2009 recession, for example, long-term unemployment as a proportion of the total labour force did not return to its pre-recession level until May 2019.
Employment in the services-producing sector declines, while it rebounds in the goods-producing sector
Employment in the services-producing sector declined by 76,000 (-0.5%) in June, with losses spread across several industries.
The largest decline was in retail trade (-58,000; -2.5%), erasing gains made earlier in the year. Data over the coming months will shed light on whether employment in this industry might be impacted by any changing consumer behaviours associated with inflation and Canadians' ability to meet day-to-day expenses. Compared with 12 months earlier, there were 67,000 (+3.0%) more people working in retail trade in June.
In the services-producing sector, employment also fell in health care and social assistance (-20,000; -0.8%), information culture and recreation (-14,000; -1.7%), and educational services (-14,000; -0.9%) in June. In contrast, employment was up in public administration (+15,000; +1.3%).
In the goods-producing sector, overall employment rebounded by 33,000 (+0.8%) in June, following a decline observed in May (-41,000; -1.0%).
The number of people working in construction grew by 23,000 (+1.5%), with Ontario (+19,000; +3.3%) accounting for the majority of the increase. This increase recouped losses observed over the previous two months. On a year-over-year basis, employment in construction grew at a faster pace (+8.0%; +118,000) than most other industries.
In manufacturing, employment rose by 26,000 (+1.5%) in June, partially offsetting a decrease of 43,000 (-2.4%) in May. Compared with 12 months earlier, employment in the industry was up by 37,000 (+2.2%) in June.
The sole industry in the goods-producing sector to see an employment decrease in June was natural resources (-20,000; -5.8%). Employment in this industry had been trending upward since December 2021, but the June decrease returned it to virtually the same level observed in June 2021. Employment in some components of this industry—such as the oil and gas extraction sector, and mining and forestry—may be particularly vulnerable to instability in global commodity markets.
Employment declines in Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec, rises in Prince Edward Island and Manitoba
Employment declined in June in both Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec, and it rose in Prince Edward Island and Manitoba. For further information on key province and industry level labour market indicators, see "Labour Force Survey in brief: Interactive app."
In Newfoundland and Labrador, employment fell by 4,300 (-1.9%) in June, partly offsetting gains recorded in April and May. The unemployment rate was little changed at 9.9% while the labour force participation rate declined 1.2 percentage points to 56.5%.
Employment in Quebec fell 27,000 in June (-0.6%), the second decline in three months. The largest losses occurred in natural resources, as well as information, culture and recreation. There were notable gains, however, in professional, scientific and technical services, as well as manufacturing. Despite fewer people employed, the unemployment rate was little changed at 4.3% and continued to hover around a record low. In the Montréal census metropolitan area, both employment and the unemployment rate (4.7%) were little changed.
Prince Edward Island saw an employment increase (+1,600; +1.9%) for the second consecutive month in June, and the unemployment rate fell 2.9 percentage points to a record low of 4.9%. The employment increase was spread across a number of industries.
Employment also rose in Manitoba in June (+4,000; +0.6%) as gains in full-time employment more than offset losses in part-time work. The unemployment rate fell 0.9 percentage points to 3.8%, on par with the record low reached in June 2006 (3.7%).
In Ontario, employment was little changed for the third consecutive month, while the unemployment rate fell 0.4 percentage points to 5.1%.
Quarterly update for the territories
Following gains in the fourth quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022, employment in the Northwest Territories held steady in the second quarter. Over the same period, the unemployment rate was little changed at 4.5%.
Employment in Yukon increased by 900 in the three months ending in June, partly offsetting a decline in the first quarter of 2022. The employment rate rose from 68.1% in the first quarter of 2022 to 70.4% in the second quarter, and the unemployment rate fell 3.3 percentage points to 2.5%.
In Nunavut, the employment rate was 54.5% for the three months ending in June, and the unemployment rate was 13.3%.
In the Spotlight: Wage growth, work location, and working by necessity
Pace of wage growth accelerates, led by non-unionized employees
Average hourly wages for employees rose 5.2% (+$1.54 to $31.24) on a year-over-year basis in June, compared with a year-over-year increase of 3.9% (+$1.18) in May. The most recent inflation data indicate that the Consumer Price Index rose 7.7% on a year-over-year basis in May.
The extent to which individual employees see their wages increase is influenced by a wide range of factors, including whether or not they are covered by a collective bargaining agreement or a union contract. While having union coverage can increase employees' ability to negotiate larger wage increases, these increases can be delayed until collective agreements expire and a new round of collective bargaining begins. As of June, the average hourly wages of all employees who had union coverage were up 3.7% (+$1.21 to $34.32) on a year-over-year basis, compared with 6.1% (+$1.71 to $29.90) for employees who did not.
Recent differences in the wage growth of unionized versus non-unionized employees were reflected in differences in wage growth across industries in June, as none of the three industries with the highest levels of unionization recorded above-average annual growth. These three industries were health care and social assistance (+4.2%; +$1.23 to $30.68); educational services (+2.5%; +$0.89 to $36.73); and public administration (+2.5%; +$0.99 to $39.97). In contrast, in the professional, scientific and technical services industry, where fewer than 1 in 20 (3.8%) employees have union coverage, wages were up 9.9% (+$3.59 to $39.99) in June compared with one year earlier.
For additional information on interpreting wage growth, see "Disaggregating wage growth: Trends and considerations."
Nearly 1 in 5 employees working from home report to a worksite located outside their region
Despite the lifting of public health restrictions across the country, working from home and hybrid work arrangements continue to represent a key aspect of daily life at work for many Canadians. For some people who work from home, this may involve working in a different region, province or time zone from their colleagues or managers.
In June 2022, the proportion of workers who usually work all of their hours at home fell 1.3 percentage points to 17.9%. Compared with May, the prevalence of hybrid work—or working some hours at home and some at another location—increased by 0.4 percentage points to 6.7% (population aged 15 to 69; not seasonally adjusted). During the summer months, changes in work location may be partly due to the composition of employment, as many summer jobs are in industries such as accommodation and food services, where fewer workers are able to work at home.
In a context where job vacancies remain high, some businesses may continue to explore options to widen their recruitment pool and increase retention by allowing their employees to work from a different province or region.
In June, of the 3.3 million employees who usually work most of their hours from home, just under 1 in 5 (601,000 or 18.0%) indicated that they report to an office or worksite that is located in a region to which they could not commute on a daily basis. Among those, more than half (336,000 or 10.0% of all employees who work from home) report to a different town or region within their province, while less than one-third (179,000 or 5.3% of all employees who work from home) report to a worksite located in a different province. The proportion who report to a different province from where they live was highest in the Atlantic provinces (13.6%) and in the Prairies (12.4%) (population aged 15 to 69; not seasonally adjusted).
In addition to self-employed workers who may interact with clients in other countries, Canadians who are employees and who work from home may also report to a worksite in another country, provided that their employer hires them through a Canadian subsidiary. As of June, when the LFS included questions on this topic for the first time, 2.6% (87,000) of employees who work most of their hours from home reported to an office or worksite located in a different country (population aged 15 to 69; not seasonally adjusted).
People employed at age 60 and older are more likely to work by necessity rather than by choice
As Canada faces record-high retirements from an aging labour force in the context of a tight labour market, understanding whether older workers remain in the labour force by necessity or by choice may be helpful in designing strategies to mitigate downward pressure on labour participation.
New data from the LFS show that the proportion of older workers who are working by necessity rather than choice has changed little in the past two years. In February 2022 (the most recent data), more than half (55.4%) of people working past their 60th birthday were doing so by necessity—that is, for reasons such as paying for essential expenses or because they are not yet eligible for a pension. This was similar to the proportion in February 2021 (56.9%) and in March 2020 (56.8%), when this question was first added to the LFS (not seasonally adjusted).
In February 2022, working by necessity was more common among workers aged 60 and older with high school education or less (59.8%). Conversely, a slight majority (52.6%) of those with a bachelor's degree or higher continued to work by choice—that is, for reasons such as paying for travel or other desirable items, or because they enjoyed working and were not ready to retire.
Since February 2022, labour market conditions have continued to tighten, potentially further supporting opportunities for older workers who want to stay employed by choice, and the pace of growth in consumer prices has accelerated, potentially putting pressure on others to stay employed out of necessity. Forthcoming data in the coming months will shed light on whether these changes have shifted the balance of necessity versus choice for this important group of workers.
Labour force characteristics by province, age group and sex, seasonally adjusted (Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick)
Labour force characteristics by province, age group and sex, seasonally adjusted (Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia)
Labour force characteristics by census metropolitan area, three-month moving average, seasonally adjusted
Labour force characteristics by Montréal, Toronto and Vancouver census metropolitan areas, monthly, seasonally adjusted
Labour force characteristics by province and economic region, three-month moving average ending in June 2021 and June 2022, unadjusted for seasonality
Average usual hours and wages of employees by selected characteristics, unadjusted for seasonality
Regional unemployment rates used by the Employment Insurance program,, three-month moving average, seasonally adjusted
Sustainable Development Goals
On January 1, 2016, the world officially began implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development—the United Nations' transformative plan of action that addresses urgent global challenges over the next 15 years. The plan is based on 17 specific sustainable development goals.
The Labour Force Survey is an example of how Statistics Canada supports the reporting on the Global Goals for Sustainable Development. This release will be used in helping to measure the following goals:
Note to readers
The Labour Force Survey (LFS) estimates for June are for the week of June 12 to 18, 2022.
The LFS estimates are based on a sample and are therefore subject to sampling variability. As a result, monthly estimates will show more variability than trends observed over longer time periods. For more information, see "Interpreting Monthly Changes in Employment from the Labour Force Survey."
This analysis focuses on differences between estimates that are statistically significant at the 68% confidence level.
LFS estimates at the Canada level do not include the territories.
The LFS estimates are the first in a series of labour market indicators released by Statistics Canada, which includes indicators from programs such as the Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours (SEPH); Employment Insurance Statistics; and the Job Vacancy and Wage Survey. For more information on the conceptual differences between employment measures from the LFS and those from the SEPH, refer to section 8 of the Guide to the Labour Force Survey (). 71-543-G
Since March 2020, all LFS face-to-face interviews have been replaced by telephone interviews conducted by interviewers working from their home to protect the health of both respondents and interviewers. While this has resulted in a decline in the LFS response rate, close to 49,000 interviews were completed in June and in-depth data quality evaluations conducted each month confirm that the LFS continues to produce an accurate portrait of Canada's labour market.
The employment rate is the number of employed people as a percentage of the population aged 15 and older. The rate for a particular group (for example, youths aged 15 to 24) is the number employed in that group as a percentage of the population for that group.
The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed people as a percentage of the labour force (employed and unemployed).
The participation rate is the number of employed and unemployed people as a percentage of the population aged 15 and older.
Full-time employment consists of persons who usually work 30 hours or more per week at their main or only job.
Part-time employment consists of persons who usually work less than 30 hours per week at their main or only job.
Total hours worked refers to the number of hours actually worked at the main job by the respondent during the reference week, including paid and unpaid hours. These hours reflect temporary decreases or increases in work hours (for example, hours lost due to illness, vacation, holidays or weather; or more hours worked due to overtime).
In general, month-to-month or year-to-year changes in the number of people employed in an age group reflect the net effect of two factors: (1) the number of people who changed employment status between reference periods, and (2) the number of employed people who entered or left the age group (including through aging, death or migration) between reference periods.
Supplementary indicators used in the June 2022 analysis
Employed, worked zero hours includes employees and self-employed who were absent from work all week, but excludes people who have been away for reasons such as 'vacation,' 'maternity,' 'seasonal business,' and 'labour dispute.'
Employed, worked less than half of their usual hours includes both employees and self-employed, where only employees were asked to provide a reason for the absence. This excludes reasons for absence such as 'vacation,' 'labour dispute,' 'maternity,' 'holiday,' and 'weather.' Also excludes those who were away all week.
Not in labour force but wanted work includes persons who were neither employed, nor unemployed during the reference period and wanted work, but did not search for reasons such as 'waiting for recall (to former job),' 'waiting for replies from employers,' 'believes no work available (in area, or suited to skills),' 'long-term future start,' and 'other.'
Unemployed, job searchers were without work, but had looked for work in the past four weeks ending with the reference period and were available for work.
Unemployed, temporary layoff or future starts were on temporary layoff due to business conditions, with an expectation of recall, and were available for work; or were without work, but had a job to start within four weeks from the reference period and were available for work (don't need to have looked for work during the four weeks ending with the reference week).
Labour underutilization rate (specific definition to measure the COVID-19 impact) combines all those who were unemployed with those who were not in the labour force but wanted a job and did not look for one; as well as those who remained employed but lost all or the majority of their usual work hours for reasons likely related to COVID-19 as a proportion of the potential labour force.
Potential labour force (specific definition to measure the impact of COVID-19) includes people in the labour force (all employed and unemployed people), and people not in the labour force who wanted a job but didn't search for reasons such as 'waiting for recall (to former job),' 'waiting for replies from employers,' 'believes no work available (in area, or suited to skills),' 'long-term future start,' and 'other.'
New information in June
The information on working by necessity or choice among people aged 60 and older comes from one of five new questions that were added to the LFS in March 2020. The topics of the other four questions were: the main activity of people not in the labour force, employment benefits, the total number of jobs held by multiple job holders, and the earnings of self-employed workers. Results for these five questions are now available as custom requests for the period from March 2020 to February 2022. Results for more recent months, as well as ongoing monthly updates, will be available in Fall 2022.
Unless otherwise stated, this release presents seasonally adjusted estimates, which facilitate comparisons by removing the effects of seasonal variations. For more information on seasonal adjustment, see Seasonally adjusted data – Frequently asked questions.
The seasonally adjusted data for retail trade and wholesale trade industries presented here are not published in other public LFS tables. A seasonally adjusted series is published for the combined industry classification (wholesale and retail trade).
The next release of the LFS will be on August 5, 2022. July data will reflect labour market conditions during the week of July 10 to 16, 2022.
More information about the concepts and use of the Labour Force Survey is available online in the Guide to the Labour Force Survey (71-543-G).
The product "Labour Force Survey in brief: Interactive app" (14200001) is also available. This interactive visualization application provides seasonally adjusted estimates by province, sex, age group and industry.
The product "Labour Market Indicators, by province and census metropolitan area, seasonally adjusted" (71-607-X) is also available. This interactive dashboard provides customizable access to key labour market indicators.
The product "Labour Market Indicators, by province, territory and economic region, unadjusted for seasonality" (71-607-X) is also available. This dynamic web application provides access to labour market indicators for Canada, province, territory and economic region.
The product Labour Force Survey: Public Use Microdata File (71M0001X) is also available. This public use microdata file contains non-aggregated data for a wide variety of variables collected from the Labour Force Survey. The data have been modified to ensure that no individual or business is directly or indirectly identified. This product is for users who prefer to do their own analysis by focusing on specific subgroups in the population or by cross-classifying variables that are not in our catalogued products.
For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact us (toll-free 1-800-263-1136; 514-283-8300; firstname.lastname@example.org) or Media Relations (email@example.com).